I'm coming off the week from hell at the office, so other than checking out Twitter at odd moments of the day, I've done virtually no reading. Yesterday, while brain-dead surfing and unwinding at the end of the week, I ran across this piece at Catholic World Report. I knew that Cardinal Kasper has been in the news a lot (I kept seeing headlines about him), but I didn't realize how disreputable he had become. If this the following passage is true, I think we can safely discard him and his "wing" of the Church:
Kasper had previously denied he’d made the remarks attributed to him by journalist Edward Pentin, then stated that he had been recorded speaking to journalists without his knowledge.
Again, if true and fully accurate, the man is a scoundrel and he walks in the shoes of dishonest progressives over the past fifty years: it it advances the liberal agenda, it's acceptable, even if it's dishonest, inaccurate, abusive, or otherwise dishonorable.
The whole episode reminds me of Richard John Neuhaus recounting debate between European clerics and African clerics in the Anglican Church over things like homosexuality. I don't remember the details, but one of the European clerics made reference to the less developed Africans. Neuhaus said something like, "Of course, these people were just swinging from vines a generation ago." Pretty funny. I wish I could find it online.
It's not often that I read something at Slate and say, "Rat own!" But this guy pretty much nails it, even if he doesn't go quite far enough in my opinion: Don't Say Goodbye.
He advocates a thing called "ghosting":
Ghosting—aka the Irish goodbye, the French exit, and any number of other vaguely ethnophobic terms—refers to leaving a social gathering without saying your farewells. One moment you’re at the bar, or the house party, or the Sunday morning wedding brunch. The next moment you’re gone. In the manner of a ghost.
Back in my more youthful years, I was a master of drunken ghosting. I'd be at the bar, over-imbibing, then go to the bathroom and, while standing there, think to myself, "I've had enough. Time to go." I'd then leave without announcement and walk the two blocks or two miles to my home. I thought it was my "thing," but I read years later in Modern Drunkard Magazine that it's a common magic vanishing act pulled off by drunks all over the land (alas, I couldn't find that article at MDM while writing this post).
Anyway, the Slate writer says ghosting should be acceptable, even if you're not drunk:
Goodbyes are, by their very nature, at least a mild bummer. They represent the waning of an evening or event. By the time we get to them, we’re often tired, drunk, or both. The short-timer just wants to go home to bed, while the night owl would prefer not to acknowledge the growing lateness of the hour. These sorts of goodbyes inevitably devolve into awkward small talk that lasts too long and then peters out. We vow vaguely to meet again, then linger for a moment, thinking of something else we might say before the whole exchange fizzles and we shuffle apart. Repeat this several times, at a social outing delightfully filled with your acquaintances, and it starts to sap a not inconsiderable portion of that delight.
Let’s free ourselves from this meaningless, uncomfortable, good time–dampening kabuki. People are thrilled that you showed up, but no one really cares that you’re leaving.
Amen to that. I've thrown many parties over the years, and it's never, not once, crossed my mind that someone ought to come seek me out and say good-bye. Indeed, it would've been a hassle for me to say good-bye constantly as I constantly tried to re-fill my cup.
The writer says it would be inappropriate to ghost at a party of fewer than ten. He might be right, but I disagree. Fewer than three, yes, because then you're leaving your wife at the table by herself (which, to the best of my recollection, I've never done), but with nine people at a party? I think you can ghost, especially if it's late and it's drunken ghosting. If 11.11% of the party leaves, that's no big deal.
So where would I draw the line? I'd say fewer than four, but each circumstance is different. If it's you, your wife, and another couple, you can't ghost by yourself, and if you ghost with your wife, it's the same as ghosting with fewer than three, so the number is fewer than five. If you're the designated driver in the Amish hauler, the number is fewer than thirteen: which is how many an Amish hauler typically holds. If you're the guest of honor, the number might be fewer than twenty, depending on the occasion, the lateness of the hour, and precedent (I've ghosted at my own parties, albeit involuntarily, while a lot of people were still there; no one took offense and, indeed, were, I'm assured, quite entertained by it).
Regardless of the correct number, you can also, as the writer suggests, "set up" the ghosting ahead of time: tell your host upon arriving, "I'll say goodbye now, even though I plan on being here for a long time, because I don't like goodbyes." I've done that. I've never once had anyone remotely take offense.
Anyway, my heartfelt thanks to the writer. He has, hopefully, done all of us a public service by getting rid of a form of politeness that has, in my opinion, run its course. Please pass along his message or this post.
Ruminations on the Fall of Rome
The bottom line is: Everything that makes a European different from the rest of mankind was originally peculiar to the Roman Empire or is demonstrably derived from something peculiar to it.
This is seen in material things: wheeled traffic; our building materials, brick, glass, mortar, cut-stone; our cooking, our staple food and drink; in forms, the arch, the column, the bridge, the tower, the well, the road, the canal; in expression, the alphabet, the very words of most of our numerous dialects and polite languages, the order of still more, the logical sequence of our thought; implements: the saw, the hammer, the plane, the chisel, the file, the spade, the plough, the rake, the sickle, the ladder.
It is also seen in our institutions: the divisions and the sub-divisions of Europe, the parish, the county, the province, the fixed national traditions with their boundaries, the emplacement of the great European cities, the routes of communication between them, the universities, the parliaments and congresses, the courts and their jurisprudence.
All these things spring from Rome. It is our well-spring, and the Catholic Church was the soul of this well-spring as it flowed into the Middle Ages.
Catholic Men's Quarterly, a one-of-a-kind general interest men's magazine written by Catholic men for Catholic men. Makes a great Father's Day gift.
"The Daily Eudemon is the sort of thing
that Chesterton or Mencken would be doing, if they were
alive today. It's what, in saner times, was called journalism.
In the writing and in the reading, it's exactly the sort
of leisure we should want at the basis of culture."Mike
Aquilina, Author of The Fathers of the Church
and TV Talk Show Host.
Catholicism-urbane, witty, engaged-is alive and well!
If you can read, you should be reading The Daily Eudemon!"David
Scott, author of A Revolution of Love: The Meaning
of Mother Teresa
you like your blogs pithy, nimble, pointed, high-spirited,
and waggish, then bookmmark Eric Scheske's The Daily
Eudemon. Ooops! You want prolixity, density, meandering,
dull, and sober? Then run (do not walk!) to the blogs
of the major news outlets. They have just what you want.
Honestly they do." John
Peterson, Editor, G.K. Chesterton: Collected Works,
Volumes 12 and 13.
Scheske's web site is full of information and insight.
Always worth a read."James
V. Schall, Author of Another Sort of Learning.