<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Daily Eudemon</title>
	<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Different Kind of Blog. Religion and Popular Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by Bill White</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-22093</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-22093</guid>
					<description>12 for me, and I'm 42 next month.  Most of them came from growing up poor in a tiny farm town - e.g., grandma had a wash tub wringer as of 1972 or so and the IGA uptown (8 buildings away) sold candy cigarettes and the little wax Coke bottles.  Not on the quiz, but I remember Dad filling up his sky-blue Chevy Something-or-Other for 25 cents a gallon - 1969 or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 for me, and I&#8217;m 42 next month.  Most of them came from growing up poor in a tiny farm town - e.g., grandma had a wash tub wringer as of 1972 or so and the IGA uptown (8 buildings away) sold candy cigarettes and the little wax Coke bottles.  Not on the quiz, but I remember Dad filling up his sky-blue Chevy Something-or-Other for 25 cents a gallon - 1969 or so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Moanin&#8217; by matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6057#comment-22023</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6057#comment-22023</guid>
					<description>I'm so sorry to hear about Playboy. Poor things. The thing is, I wish it were because the culture was turning away from such things. Sadly, I think it's so increasingly prevalent that Playboy is now boring to many. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so sorry to hear about Playboy. Poor things. The thing is, I wish it were because the culture was turning away from such things. Sadly, I think it&#8217;s so increasingly prevalent that Playboy is now boring to many. Sigh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by LarryD</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-22016</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-22016</guid>
					<description>9 for me.  We weren't allowed to have fun as kids, so that knocked about half off the list for me.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 for me.  We weren&#8217;t allowed to have fun as kids, so that knocked about half off the list for me.  <img src='http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shaw on Clericalism by Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6052#comment-21922</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6052#comment-21922</guid>
					<description>Trust me, you're one of the good ones, Father. I will pray for the renewal of the priesthood, but when reading comments like this one, I can't help but think it has already begun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me, you&#8217;re one of the good ones, Father. I will pray for the renewal of the priesthood, but when reading comments like this one, I can&#8217;t help but think it has already begun.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21902</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21902</guid>
					<description>I'm 39 and I had 14.  The drop off was considerabel for The Saint.  She's 3 years younger than I but got only 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 39 and I had 14.  The drop off was considerabel for The Saint.  She&#8217;s 3 years younger than I but got only 7.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shaw on Clericalism by Fr. Brian Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6052#comment-21866</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6052#comment-21866</guid>
					<description>In any institution, information is important, and the communication of that information is essential to the life of that institution.  It is entirely regrettable that in the Church, the significance of information is seen as a power, and those who wield information wield it as a power over others.  This is sinful, plain and simple.  Angels weep and the body of Christ suffers because of this, and the work of the Gospel is frustrated.  

The Church is a divine institution that is populated by sinners:  every single member is a sinner.  Only the Head of the Church, Christ, and the Mother of the Church, Mary, are sinless.  The rest of us come under the influence of evil, what Paul VI referred to as the &quot;smoke of Satan.&quot;  It is forever the challenge of the members of the Church, clergy and laity, striving to serve God and His people faithfully.

The sinfulness of priests is especially discouraging, as they are commissioned to serve in leadership, proclaiming the Gospel and setting an example.  The operative word is &quot;serve.&quot;  When service is forgotten or set aside, sin prevails, and the smoke of Satan chokes the faithful.  The failure to communicate truthfully is in direct opposition to the ministry of the Word:  you shall know the truth, and the truth will set you free. 

I wish that the duplicity that has been observed here among clergy was limited to diocesan chanceries; sadly and clearly, it isn't.  I appeal to the faithful to pray for their priests, to pray specifically that they will continually conform themselves to the image of Christ, to receive the grace of God that transforms priests into living icons of Christ.  I am so far from this transformation, and am constantly reminded of my unworthiness to be a priest.

The specific virtue needed is humility.  I am reminded of this as I have reflected regularly on the life of our parish patron here, St. Charles Borromeo, whose episcopal motto was &quot;Humilitas.&quot;  The experience of the modern Church, especially in the suffering from criminal sexual abuse, will continue to bring the clergy to that humility.  The decline in financial stability in the Church will also contribute greatly to a growth in clerical humility, and will by necessity bring priests to a life of greater simplicity and service.  

There is a tremendous need for reform, the new Pentecost that Benedict XVI spoke of during his recent visit to America.  Pray today, on this solemn feast of Pentecost, that the Holy Spirit will bring about this renewal in the priesthood, and may it begin with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any institution, information is important, and the communication of that information is essential to the life of that institution.  It is entirely regrettable that in the Church, the significance of information is seen as a power, and those who wield information wield it as a power over others.  This is sinful, plain and simple.  Angels weep and the body of Christ suffers because of this, and the work of the Gospel is frustrated.  </p>
<p>The Church is a divine institution that is populated by sinners:  every single member is a sinner.  Only the Head of the Church, Christ, and the Mother of the Church, Mary, are sinless.  The rest of us come under the influence of evil, what Paul VI referred to as the &#8220;smoke of Satan.&#8221;  It is forever the challenge of the members of the Church, clergy and laity, striving to serve God and His people faithfully.</p>
<p>The sinfulness of priests is especially discouraging, as they are commissioned to serve in leadership, proclaiming the Gospel and setting an example.  The operative word is &#8220;serve.&#8221;  When service is forgotten or set aside, sin prevails, and the smoke of Satan chokes the faithful.  The failure to communicate truthfully is in direct opposition to the ministry of the Word:  you shall know the truth, and the truth will set you free. </p>
<p>I wish that the duplicity that has been observed here among clergy was limited to diocesan chanceries; sadly and clearly, it isn&#8217;t.  I appeal to the faithful to pray for their priests, to pray specifically that they will continually conform themselves to the image of Christ, to receive the grace of God that transforms priests into living icons of Christ.  I am so far from this transformation, and am constantly reminded of my unworthiness to be a priest.</p>
<p>The specific virtue needed is humility.  I am reminded of this as I have reflected regularly on the life of our parish patron here, St. Charles Borromeo, whose episcopal motto was &#8220;Humilitas.&#8221;  The experience of the modern Church, especially in the suffering from criminal sexual abuse, will continue to bring the clergy to that humility.  The decline in financial stability in the Church will also contribute greatly to a growth in clerical humility, and will by necessity bring priests to a life of greater simplicity and service.  </p>
<p>There is a tremendous need for reform, the new Pentecost that Benedict XVI spoke of during his recent visit to America.  Pray today, on this solemn feast of Pentecost, that the Holy Spirit will bring about this renewal in the priesthood, and may it begin with me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by The Spokesrider</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21800</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21800</guid>
					<description>I can't beat Gramps on the 78rpm records.  We had those when I was a kid, but our phonograph used electricity.   But then, I'm only 59. 

A few weeks ago I was showing my 89-year-old father some YouTube music performances of Rachmaninoff from the early 20s, and asked, half joking, if he listened to any Rachmaninoff at home back then.  He said no, but they had a windup phonograph that played thick records.  It was one with a big trumpet for a speaker. Did it have a RCA dog pictured on it, I asked?  Yes, he thought it did.  I'll bet I know where it ended up, I told him.  I had remembered playing with one like he described in my cousin's attic, probably during summer vacation in 1958 (i.e. not that long ago).  Dad said that was probably it.  He had always wondered what had happened to that phonograph, and it wouldn't have surprised him that his oldest brother ended up with it.  

It seemed kind of strange that I had more recent information than he did about a household mystery from the distant past.  (We haven't yet inquired as to whether it still exists.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t beat Gramps on the 78rpm records.  We had those when I was a kid, but our phonograph used electricity.   But then, I&#8217;m only 59. </p>
<p>A few weeks ago I was showing my 89-year-old father some YouTube music performances of Rachmaninoff from the early 20s, and asked, half joking, if he listened to any Rachmaninoff at home back then.  He said no, but they had a windup phonograph that played thick records.  It was one with a big trumpet for a speaker. Did it have a RCA dog pictured on it, I asked?  Yes, he thought it did.  I&#8217;ll bet I know where it ended up, I told him.  I had remembered playing with one like he described in my cousin&#8217;s attic, probably during summer vacation in 1958 (i.e. not that long ago).  Dad said that was probably it.  He had always wondered what had happened to that phonograph, and it wouldn&#8217;t have surprised him that his oldest brother ended up with it.  </p>
<p>It seemed kind of strange that I had more recent information than he did about a household mystery from the distant past.  (We haven&#8217;t yet inquired as to whether it still exists.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by Gramps</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21774</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21774</guid>
					<description>Perfect score. What's more, I remember 78 rpm records and the wind-up (non electrical) phonographs we played them on. If dirt is younger than 75, then, yeah, I be older than dirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect score. What&#8217;s more, I remember 78 rpm records and the wind-up (non electrical) phonographs we played them on. If dirt is younger than 75, then, yeah, I be older than dirt.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by The Spokesrider</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21757</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21757</guid>
					<description>23

The bad thing is finding out that some of those old people whom I treat as my elders are actually younger than me.  

And as for those '68 Tigers, there is a more important name than those others to mention:  Pitching coach Johnny Sain.   Where he was hired he won pennants.  (E.g. for my 1965 Minnesota Twins.)  When he was let go, the team went downhill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23</p>
<p>The bad thing is finding out that some of those old people whom I treat as my elders are actually younger than me.  </p>
<p>And as for those &#8216;68 Tigers, there is a more important name than those others to mention:  Pitching coach Johnny Sain.   Where he was hired he won pennants.  (E.g. for my 1965 Minnesota Twins.)  When he was let go, the team went downhill.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something for No-Blogging Saturday by Rob Sisson</title>
		<link>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21732</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ericscheske.com/blog/?p=6055#comment-21732</guid>
					<description>How about 21? Rather than older than dirt, i think we were just poor or lived between the &quot;coasts&quot; where new fangled things took a bit longer to get to us!

I'm 48...and 2008 is the 40th anniversary of the greatest sports team of all time...The 1968 Detroit Tigers...

Lolich &amp;#38; McClain, Cash, McCauliffe, Oyler, Wert, Horton, Northrup, Stanley, Freehan...and the greatest ball player of all time...Al Kaline! And good ol' Mayo Smith at the managerial helm.

No arguments...you youngsters...the 1984 team was qualified to carry the 68's dirty socks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about 21? Rather than older than dirt, i think we were just poor or lived between the &#8220;coasts&#8221; where new fangled things took a bit longer to get to us!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 48&#8230;and 2008 is the 40th anniversary of the greatest sports team of all time&#8230;The 1968 Detroit Tigers&#8230;</p>
<p>Lolich &amp; McClain, Cash, McCauliffe, Oyler, Wert, Horton, Northrup, Stanley, Freehan&#8230;and the greatest ball player of all time&#8230;Al Kaline! And good ol&#8217; Mayo Smith at the managerial helm.</p>
<p>No arguments&#8230;you youngsters&#8230;the 1984 team was qualified to carry the 68&#8217;s dirty socks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
